EPSRC staff offer their hints and tips on writing strong funding applications and tackle some of the common misconceptions around applying for EPSRC funding. We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UKRI or any other funder. https://www.ukri.org/opportunity/early-career-researcher-international-collaboration-grants, New Investigator Award frequently asked questions, San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme, EPSRC repeatedly unsuccessful applicants policy, Read about support available on EPSRC grants for people with caring responsibilities, trusted research and innovation principles, EPSRC framework for responsible innovation, Joint Electronic Submission (Je-S) system, EPSRC guidance on project partners letter of support, Advice on writing proposals for EPSRC funding, Guidance on completing ethical information on the Je-S form, UK Research and Innovation grant terms and conditions, an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. Smaller items of equipment (individually under 10,000) should be in the Directly Incurred Other Costs heading. Applicants have been advised that their applications should be based on the information available at the point of submission and, if applicable, the known application specific impacts of COVID-19 should be accounted for. This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. This question requires an answer. The study, published in PLOS ONE, brought together researchers and clinicians at UCL Engineering, UCLH and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana to investigate a new non-invasive diagnostic technique using smartphone photographs of the eye and face. Find out more aboutourpathway for change. Your application must also include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDF documents to avoid errors. Proposed collaborations for this open funding route may involve international research partners from any country, this can include researchers in 1 or more lower middle income, low income, or least developed countries on the Development Assistance Committee list, where the focus of the research is outside the official development assistance compliance criteria. They should be completed in single-spaced 11 font Arial or similar sans serif typeface. whether mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the planned activities have been built in. EPSRC assessment processes, including expert reviewing and panels, may acknowledge the impact of university contributions, but will not consider the level of matched university funding as a factor on which to base funding decisions. UKRI is implementing a standard method for inputting overseas costs on Je-S from 1 July 2021. Projects should be self-contained and comprise a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. The reviewer form asks reviewers to summarise their view of the application. If applications to the open funding route and international development funding route are assessed at the same panel they will be ranked on separate rank order lists. EPSRC may reject applications that do not meet attachment format requirements. The full economic cost of your project can be up to 4. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Under the NIA scheme, funding is typically sought for 10% to 20% of the principal investigators time. Applicants who intend to submit an application to this funding opportunity should complete the following intention to submit by 7 December 2022. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) is introducing the new scheme following a recent review of First Grants. The proposal, reviewers comments and your response will then go to a panel that will score it against our assessment criteria and rank it with other new investigator proposals. HONORS AND AWARDS . This should reflect your overall conclusion, and should be consistent with your comments on the individual sections of your review, taking account of all the assessment criteria and the various weightings you applied. Sub-contracting costs can be claimed as an exception to bring in non-standard expertise and is relevant to research and help further the partnership but it needs to be distinguished from a co-investigator. The NIA scheme can only be applied to once, whether previous applications were successful or not, except when permission to resubmit an application is invited after peer review. Where you believe that there are less than three potential suppliers for an item you should explain this in the justification of resources. epsrc new investigator award example. Elegance of presentation is not, of itself, an assessment criterion for an EPSRC grant. The reviewer form asks reviewers to comment on the national importance of the research. illustrated by examples of recent activities. Universities should pay particular attention to ensure that the new investigator is properly supported and mentored through their supervision of the student, and that adequate attention is paid to the training of both the student and the investigator. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . You are expected to work within the EPSRC framework for responsible innovation. You should provide your overall assessment of the application. For multidisciplinary applications please state which aspects of the application you feel qualified to assess. Office of Research Development and Education (ORDE) in the . Direct responsibility to the holders of the research award. Fewer quotes are acceptable if justification is provided in the justification of resources. Work in collaboration with . For the purpose of research assessment, please consider the value and impact of all research outputs (including datasets, software, inventions, patents, preprints and other commercial activities) in addition to research publications. Finally the presentation will ask how organisations such as FIG and ISPRS can play a part in these developments. If, in your judgement, it appears that the New Investigator Award is essentially to supplement the student project, this should be assigned a low score and treated as a flawed proposal. You can apply for a new investigator award at any time in any field of research relevant to our remit. CVs, not exceeding two A4 sides each, should be submitted as separate attachments using Attachment Type CV in Je-S, and are only required for named research staff or visiting researchers. It is preferable that collaborative partners will contribute cash to the project, although "tangible" material contributions from industrial collaborators may also be consider We recognise that information provided in the full proposal, including the names of the international partners, may differ from the information provided in the intention to submit form. letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form (no page limit), technical assessments for facilities listed as requiring one in the Je-S guidance (no page limit), host organisation letter of support (2 pages), cover letter (optional attachment, no page limit, not seen by peer review). The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap that has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. 1423 . As part of the impact assessment, reviewers comment on whether a collaboration is appropriate; therefore, a good project partner letter of support shows that the collaboration is genuine, and explains why the project partner supports the project. It is particularly important therefore that the panel have clear advice on the merits of each component. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. stream 2 (for established or mature clusters): estimate 3 to 5 awards with maximum 5 million per award, over 4 years; Standard EPSRC eligibility rules apply. Also, as Je-S does not support all Microsoft Office Word font types, unsupported fonts will be replaced, possibly resulting in layout changes to the document. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. As part of this, any private, personal or commercial interests relating to an application for funding to the research councils must be declared in a covering letter included as an application attachment. A risk with part assessment is that it will miss the added value of the overall project (the whole ideally being greater than the sum of the parts) so even where you can only comment with authority on one aspect, it will be helpful to the panel to have your views on how compelling the arguments for the overall application are. You can look for examples of funded projects by searching for new investigator in our online portfolio. meet the eligibility criteria of EPSRC New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme. As impact should be an embedded activity in the research programme, you should also assess the suitability and appropriateness of the methodology to realise impact in the proposal. If the application is in a subject or area that causes you serious personal concern, to the extent that you feel you cannot provide an objective review, you should decline to review the application giving the reason as other, and stating ethical issues in the comment box. You should ensure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines that may be in place. Clinical research training fellowship. The following information takes an ESRC Standard Grant application as a template but the information is also applicable to other funders. It is expected that part of the developmental aspect of a New Investigator Award will involve support from the university and, where possible, an assigned student. Especially compelling examples come from Harmonic Analysis, which is the branch of . The prompts are given as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact. CVs are not required for the principal or co-investigators. the applicant and wider teams ability to deliver the project through to the creation of impact. For the New Investigator Award the proposal cover letter should describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance. the project plan and management arrangements for impact, public engagement or responsible innovation, aspects of the project including timing, personnel, skills, budget, deliverables and feasibility, which should be appropriate and proportionate to the scale and complexity of the activity to be undertaken, whether there is clear responsibility for the delivery of each activity or task, whether appropriate resources to deliver the activities been requested and justified. EPSRC new investigator award. This letter will only be seen by EPSRC and will not be sent to peer review. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Robert. You should hear the result of your application within 26 weeks of submission by your host organisation. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 November 2022: Ends: 30 April 2025: Value (): 391,062: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Energy Storage: Sustainable Energy Networks . For a Principal Investigator with option for one or more Co-Investigators. Index Alphabetical listing by name. The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Councils (EPSRC) portfolio managers are happy to discuss applications before submission, particularly those with a complex management structure involving large consortia, or those crossing research themes. whether the roles and responsibilities of all members of the team have been defined, including those of users or stakeholders in both research and impact activities. Text in embedded diagrams or pictures, numerical formulae or references can be smaller, as long as it is legible. Found in: Talent UK - 30 minutes ago. The international academic project partners must also have an integral role in the proposed work. A significant grant is usually defined as including more than 6 months of postdoctoral research associate (PDRA) time, capital equipment in excess of 20,000, or in excess of 100,000 full economic costing on 1 individual grant. Universities may wish to support applicants through allocation of a PhD student. There is no page limit for the Je-S attachment, but a maximum of three letters is permitted and letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. To assist the prioritisation panel in reaching their overall conclusion on the application, and to help EPSRC in monitoring the effectiveness of its reviewer selection procedures, you are asked to indicate your confidence in your review. Before starting an application, you will need to log in or create an account in Je-S. Once you have completed your application, make sure you submit document. Reference MED03699. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. Applications will only be assessed by 1 panel. EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account - Funding Opportunity. NSF-EPSRC Organic Materials Workshop, London, England, March 2006. In exceptional circumstances, EPSRC accepts letters of support that do not meet the requirements for project partner letters of support. New England Board of Higher Education Doctoral Scholar, 1995-2000. . This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Sign up for news, views, events and funding alerts. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate to the new investigator award. Where two or more applications have been formally linked to form a single research project, you are requested to submit a single review covering the project as a whole. Working within the project team for the EPSRC project "Linking formation mechanisms, nanostructure and function in metal oxide nanosheets using multimodal characterisation" (EP/W026937/1). If you have a concern that the application raises ethical issues that have not been clearly identified or addressed, you should raise this directly with EPSRC, which will need to make a policy decision on how the application should be treated. Early career researcher collaborations for global development. Guidance on completing ethical information on the Je-S form. An NIA is not intended to be an alternative to a fellowship, standard mode grant or other similar funding mechanism. You will be a part of the decision-making process and get a broad view of the novel ideas coming through the funding pipeline in your area. This will enhance UKRIs ability to report on overseas funding to: It includes any costs incurred by organisations outside the UK, including: The Other-DI Costs document is to contain the following data in the description box in this exact format: Organisation; Country; Cost Category; Cost Description. This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. All costs will be funded at 80% of full economic costs. https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-applicants/types-of-funding-we-offer/new-investigator-award, Contacts for the New Investigator Award scheme, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). When you submit the application, it will first go to your host organisation for review. Apply before: February 3, 2023. We understand that in some research areas it might be more appropriate to request up to 35%, however anything above this would be more appropriate in standard mode. whether the applicant has identified potential stakeholders and stated the relevance and possible benefits to the stakeholders. These notes are intended to provide reviewers with specific guidance for the completion of the reviewer form. You should comment on how clearly this is described, how appropriate it is for the planned activities, and their scientific and technical feasibility. Please note that while the criteria headings mirror EPSRCs standard criteria, additional aspects have been added to the applicant and partnerships and resources and management criteria, and the applicant and partnerships criterion has been made a primary criterion. how the proposed research contributes to or helps maintain the health of other research disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to current or future UK economic success or enables future development of key emerging industries, the extent to which the research proposed has the potential to meet national strategic needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading research activity (including areas of niche capability). Clinical applicants must be employed or be on a fixed-term contract longer than the proposed project at an NHS trust, hospital, board, primary care trust or general practice. hold a fixed-term contract that extends beyond the duration of the proposed research project, and the host research organisation is prepared to give you all the support normal for a permanent employee. Date posted 2 March 2023. When adding a new proposal you should select: Your application should include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDFs to avoid errors. Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. The recently funded EPSRC New Investigator Award project, led by Dr. Wei Tan from Queen Mary's Mechanics of Composite Materials Group (MCM), will create an intelligent . Creating a Draft Proposal (ESRC example) Costing & Pricing and the Justification for Resources. Specific guidance is available for each section of the report to be completed. You may request funding for staff costs, equipment and other items required to carry out the project, costs related to impact, and travel and subsistence. EPSRC New Investigator Awards: Open to eligible researchers in any research area at any . Ethical considerations should not therefore normally be an assessment criterion and you should not take these into account when making your assessment. Your project should typically last one to three years. EPSRC. The assessment of the expert panel will be shared with you ahead of the prioritisation meeting. This is a very strong application that fully meets all assessment criteria. EPSRC cannot advise on which scheme is likely to be suitable. - Introduction-Tellthemtheoverallresearchgoal&convincethemyoucandeliverit. As such, the focus should be on the stated impact rather than the duration. Frequently asked questions and webinar questions (PDF, 420KB). Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. The NIA expectations documentgives some guidelines for applicants to consider during the initial formulation of their proposals with regards to the expected scope and features of their application. EPSRC have this week re-launched their grant funding scheme targeted specifically at Early Career Researchers. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. . So nothing is missed, EPSRC recommends that you follow the Cost to the Proposal headings used in the application form. Your project should typically last one to three years and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. For multidisciplinary proposals please state which aspects of the proposal you feel qualified to assess, contributes to or helps maintain the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry or industries, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity, complements other UK research funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, plans for dissemination and knowledge exchange with potential beneficiaries of the research, appropriateness of the track record of the applicant or applicants, unique and complementary contribution and expertise of the international partner or partners, appropriateness of the plans for developing the collaborative relationship with the international partner or partners, balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators, the level of the contribution made to this award from other sources including the UK institutions and international potential partners, any equipment requested, or the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third-party contribution, any resources requested for activities to either increase impact, for public engagement or to support responsible innovation. Reviewers should comment on how the research relates to EPSRCs research areas and strategies (many projects will be relevant to more than one EPSRC research area) and complements EPSRCs current portfolio. Where known impacts have occurred, these should have been highlighted in the application, including the assumptions and information at the point of submission. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. Multiple periods of PDRA supervision are likely to be considered holistically in terms of the skills the candidate has had the opportunity to develop, to avoid duplicating the aims of the NIA. Research quality (excellence) will always be pre-eminent, and no application can be funded without clearly demonstrating this aspect. Text in tables and figure labels not within embedded diagrams or pictures should be at least 11 point. The new target requires the UK to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050. A proposal that demonstrates excellence can be characterised by terms such as: novel, ambitious, timely, exciting, at the international forefront, adventurous, elegant, or transformative, but it need not demonstrate all of them. This will help applicants build an in-depth knowledge of our peer review processes and principles, helping you to further increase your knowledge of reviewing and proposal writing. You will be given 2 weeks to provide a response to the questions raised by the introducers. existing engagements with relevant end users and the appropriateness of any partnerships. support for other adjustments and adaptations that may be needed due to the personal or health circumstances of the principal investigator or their team. We process and handle personal information according to these regulations. Your host organisation will also be able to provide advice and guidance. ID 19673. This funding opportunity is only open to early career researchers who meet the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. joint research activities: scoping, feasibility, or proof of concept studies, programmes of exchange visits or staff secondments, up to 4,000,000 for this open funding route, up to 1,000,000 for the international development funding route, resources to enable different approaches to building and sustaining collaborations, which reduce the need to travel, proof of concept research activities for UK researchers exploring new international partnerships, principal investigator contact information, international partner name and organisation, if you will be applying for the open or international development funding route of this funding opportunity, description of research activities that will be undertaken, research disciplines you are associated with. The ESRC New Investigators Grant is a relatively new scheme for early career researchers who want to become a principal investigator (PI) and work on an independent piece of research. EPSRC wants to support early career researchers to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas. Speaker: Dirk Husmeier. The Vice Chancellor's Fellow at the School of Chemistry of the University of Bristol, has won an EPSRC New Investigator Award worth 392,000. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. We do not ask peer review to comment on eligibility. Three written quotations are required for single items of equipment costing more than 138,000 and must accompany the proposal.
Vomiting Curdled Milk Adults,
Marvin Smith Obituary,
Shannon Sharpe Daughter,
Ocean Waves Birthstone Ring,
Pregnancy Assistance Fund Application,
Articles E
